Site icon Study Fy

Module 6: Critical Thinking – ITS-455

Module 6: Critical Thinking – ITS-455

Question Description

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Option #1: Cybercrime at a Financial Institution

Cybercrime and information security breaches are a hot topic in the news today. When interacting with organizations, consumers are concerned with the privacy and security of the information they provide. Recent news reports show serious security breaches, sabotage, and even theft has occurred in both private and government institutions.

Assignment Instructions

Create a PowerPoint presentation analyzing a recent cybercrime or security breach at a financial institution as reported by a reputable news source.

  • Describe the organization’s background.
  • Explain the nature of the cybercrime that occurred.
  • Describe methods and tools potentially used to investigate the cybercrime, particularly analysis, validation, and acquisition.
  • Analyze and describe details about the impact of the cybercrime including financial losses, number of individuals affected, and the effect on the reputation of the organization.
  • Analyze the organization’s incident response and if the incident was handled in an appropriate manner

Your presentation must meet the following requirements:

  • Include an introduction slide with the title of the presentation, your name, the submission date, and a reference slide.
  • 12 or more slides of easy to understand content (text and visuals). Remember, your audience is an IT department within a marketing company.
  • Speaker’s notes containing 50-100 words per slide to elaborate on the slide. In your notes, support slide content with at least two peer-reviewed, scholarly references as well as the news source. The CSU Global Library is a great place to find these resources.
  • Avoid distracting transition elements and animations.
  • Formatted according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.).

Refer to the Critical Thinking Rubric below for more information on expectations for this assignment.

Option #2: Cybercrime at a Health Insurance Organization

Cybercrime and information security breaches are a hot topic in the news today. When interacting with organizations, consumers are concerned with the privacy and security of the information they provide. Recent news reports show serious security breaches, sabotage, and even theft has occurred in both private and government institutions.

Assignment Instructions

Write a paper analyzing a recent cybercrime or security breach at a health insurance organization as reported by a reputable news source.

  • Describe the organization’s background.
  • Explain the nature of the cybercrime that occurred.
  • Describe methods and tools potentially used to investigate the cybercrime, particularly analysis, validation, and acquisition.
  • Analyze and describe details about the impact of the cybercrime including financial losses, number of individuals affected, and the effect on the reputation of the organization.
  • Analyze the organization’s incident response and if the incident was handled in an appropriate manner.

Your paper must meet the following requirements:

  • 6-7 pages in length, not including the cover page and reference page.
  • Formatted according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Include an introduction, a body with fully developed paragraphs, and a conclusion.
  • Be clearly and well written using excellent grammar and style techniques. Be concise. Be logical. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing. If you need assistance with your writing style, visit the Writing Center (Links to an external site.), which is also accessible from the Library’s homepage.
  • Support your paper with at least two peer-reviewed, scholarly references. The CSU Global Library is a great place to find these resources.

Refer to the Critical Thinking Rubric below for more information on expectations for this assignment.

Rubric

ITS455 Mod 6 CT

ITS455 Mod 6 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in security recommendations.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides strong or adequate thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources/Examples

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples do not meet required criteria and/or are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and well written, and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not clearly organized or well written, and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.

9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.

6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.

15.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext

Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Exit mobile version