Airline Passenger Information Systems

Question Description

Hello,

Here are the instructions for this assignment:

Overview:

In this Module 5 activity, you will first review a scholarly

paper on the topic of airline passenger information systems. Next, you

will conduct in-depth research on the topic of a real-life example of a

relatively new (within the last 5 years) airline passenger information

system offered by a vendor that assists airline passengers in their

travel planning, booking, and flight experience or airline marketing,

sales, and customer service departments’ personnel in servicing those

passengers. Once you have gained knowledge relating to the topic and

gathered sufficient information, you will present a case in a scholarly

APA style paper detailing how the technology solution enables the

airline to obtain and retain new customers and to service and provide

the best passenger travel experience possible.

Review Hurry Up and Wait (ProQuest/Hunt Library) (Links to an external site.)
Conduct research relating to an airline passenger informationsystem that might be implemented at an airline where you arehypothetically employed.
- Survey the data presented on the Module 5 Readings and Resources page to collect your data. You may use the ERAU Hunt Library EAGLEsearch tool (Links to an external site.) and Subject Guides, (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. as well as the Internet to obtain any additional material you might need.
In your case study paper:
- Provide the title of the airline passenger information system and the name of the vendor that markets the technology solution.
- Describe the features that enable an airline to more effectively and efficiently provide data to its airline passengers and the airline’s marketing, sales, and customer service departments’ personnel.
- Identify a competing solution.
- Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the solution that you selected.

To receive a high-level grade in this assignment, you must putforth a considerable amount of time and effort. You will be graded onthe scholastic quality of your paper and the fulfillment of therequirements stated in the Requirements section.

Requirements:

Review the Writing Style Guide.
Review the rubric below the assignment data for detailed grading criteria before beginning your work.
Use your own words to demonstrate a clear understanding and comprehension of the subject matter.
Copying and pasting one direct quote after another withoutpresenting a majority of the data in your own words will result in a lowassignment grade.
Support your personal opinions, feelings, and observations with meaningful scholarly data obtained from primary sources.

Submission:

Submit a scholarly paper that addresses the following:

Utilize Microsoft Word.
Title Page (Page #1).
Body of the text (4-5 pages) to include:
- Centered title of the paper.
- Introductory paragraph.
- Conclusion
- In-text citations for direct quotes or paraphrased data from primary sources.
Reference List Page (Page #6 or #7).
Times New Roman 12-point font
Double-spaced lines.
APA Style 7^thEdition
Utilize the APA_Style_7th_Edition Template.docx. Edit the template to remove the informational notes and add your data. Select Enable Editing immediately below the Microsoft Word toolbar to be able to edit the document.

MGMT 494 Assignment 5.3 Case Study & Research Paper Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis & Content

55.0ptsExcellent- A THOROUGH analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of FOURFULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the body of the text.

45.0ptsVeryGood – A THOROUGH analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum ofTHREE FULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the body of thetext.

40.0ptsSatisfactory- A THOROUGH analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of TWOFULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the body of the text.

35.0ptsNearFailing – A BASIC analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum ofTWO FULL pages of double-spaced text were submitted in the body of thetext.

0.0ptsFailing – A minimum of TWO FULL pages of double-spaced text was NOT submitted in the body of the text.

55.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion & Recommendations

15.0ptsExcellent – The conclusion was sound AND the recommendations were ENTIRELY appropriate.

13.0ptsVery Good – The conclusion was sound AND the recommendations were MOSTLY appropriate.

11.0ptsSatisfactory – The conclusion was sound AND the recommendations were SOMEWHAT appropriate.

9.0ptsNear Failing – The conclusion was NOT sound OR the recommendations were NOT SOMEWHAT appropriate.

0.0ptsFailing – A conclusion with recommendations was NOT presented.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics

10.0ptsExcellent – ALL sentences were properly structured AND the data was ENTIRELY free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

9.0ptsVery Good – ALL sentences were properly structured BUT there were SOME spelling, grammar, OR punctuation errors.

8.0ptsSatisfactory – SOME sentences were NOT properly structured AND there were SOME spelling, grammar, OR punctuation errors.

7.0ptsNear Failing – SOME sentences were NOT properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, OR punctuation errors.

0.0ptsFailing – MANY sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Research

10.0ptsExcellent- Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of TWO outsideprimary sources (excluding the textbook) AND terminology from the sourcematerials was presented.

9.0ptsVeryGood – Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of TWOoutside primary sources (excluding the textbook) BUT terminology fromthe source materials was NOT presented.

8.0ptsSatisfactory- Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE outsideprimary source (excluding the textbook) AND terminology from the sourcematerials was presented.

7.0ptsNearFailing – Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of ONEoutside primary source (excluding the textbook) BUT terminology from thesource materials WAS NOT presented.

0.0ptsFailing – Scholarly research was NOT conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE outside primary source (excluding the textbook).

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style

10.0ptsExcellent- ALL of the following APA style components were provided AND therewere NO format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers,Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body of the Text,Reference List Page.

9.0ptsVeryGood – ALL of the following APA style components were provided AND therewere SOME format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers,Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body of the Text,Reference List Page.

8.0ptsSatisfactory- SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided ANDthere were NO format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers,Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body of the Text,Reference List Page.

7.0ptsNearFailing – SOME of the following APA style components were NOT providedAND there were SOME format errors: Title Page, Page Header with PageNumbers, Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body ofthe Text, Reference List Page.

0.0ptsFailing- SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided ANDthere were MANY format errors: Title Page, Page Header with PageNumbers, Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body ofthe Text, Reference List Page.

10.0 pts

Total Points:100.0



^{Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."}